About a low rank limit? Options

[2dot]

Hello there!
it's been a while i didn't play chivalry so i came back on my favorite servers some days ago.

I forgot how pain it was playing with newbies or low rank players in any 50/64 server
Lot of team damage, deadly kill steal, spam votekick, tk in spawn, charge attack in your back, no apologies, spam LMB in melee, admins spending their time banning and not playing etc etc...what a mess...

I guess how much fun it is to play with a lot of players but honestly, some people should have more experience before playing in a 50 server in my opinion. They also ruin veteran experience and any type of gameplay/teamplay.

I'm not raging, i don't want to discriminate them but only doing an observation, so here is my question:
What about a low rank limit (0-30?)? What are you, guys, thinking about it? is it even technically possible?

Regards.

[MonkeyFiend]

We can indeed set rank limits e.g. 0-30 or even set minimum ranks e.g. only people >rank 15 etc.,

The problem is the servers are funded by clan members/donations/bank of monkey and I think most people here are already well about rank 30, so if we were to start a low rank/training server most people would not be able to play (unless they use an alt but that would be some morally dubious low rank pub stomping if they do that).

Setting a minimum rank might work but it would cut a section of the playerbase from the servers and at the end of the day I'd rather have some noobs to slaughter than a bunch of empty servers.

However if it's something the clan members think might be useful, they can stick some voting options in the members are and if the majority can agree on an option I can set it up

p.s. looking at the configs we could disallow a certain rank... allowing everyone rank 0-52 and rank 54+... what rank is kanathekana again?