About a low rank limit? Options

[2dot]

Hello there!
it's been a while i didn't play chivalry so i came back on my favorite servers some days ago.

I forgot how pain it was playing with newbies or low rank players in any 50/64 server
Lot of team damage, deadly kill steal, spam votekick, tk in spawn, charge attack in your back, no apologies, spam LMB in melee, admins spending their time banning and not playing etc etc...what a mess...

I guess how much fun it is to play with a lot of players but honestly, some people should have more experience before playing in a 50 server in my opinion. They also ruin veteran experience and any type of gameplay/teamplay.

I'm not raging, i don't want to discriminate them but only doing an observation, so here is my question:
What about a low rank limit (0-30?)? What are you, guys, thinking about it? is it even technically possible?

Regards.

[GuyIncognito]

Yea, as annoying as it is right now with all the low rank chaos, I agree there shouldnt be a limit. The first games I played were on a 50 server and it was the chaotic madness of it all that I fell in love with. As been said, we only have to deal with once in a while and at the end of the day new players are a good thing for chivalry and TB. And I have to admit, I kinda enjoy annihilating noobs en masse for as long as it lasts, before they wise up.. With that said I can certainly empathise with 2dot.