![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Squire ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 111 Thank(s): 0 Joined: 10-November 09 From: Ipswich, UK Member No.: 4,159 ![]() |
Just finished watching 2012 and yesterday watched Law Abiding Citizen. The latter was 1 of best movies I seen this year and 2012 had some amazing effects altho some were not very well digitised.
Not that I condone any illegal activity, but should you stumble across any r5 lines on pb... they are both worth a look ![]() -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Knight Errant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: SM Guild Members Posts: 543 Thank(s): 0 Joined: 29-October 07 Member No.: 32 ![]() |
actually you are totally wrong. the film is designed to be viewed on film. certain things will hold up on film that won't hold up digitally. sometimes we do shots again for dvd/blu-ray release which won't hold up digitally. i go thru this all day, every day at my job. like i said, it's fine that you don't want to believe me, but I'm talking from experience.
and if you think the only thing bad fx-wise in T2 was the picking him up and onto the bike scene, then you must have somehow got a dodgy downloaded version of the film back when there wasn't even the internet (!). cuz there is tons of bad fx in that film. atleast by todays standards. which i'm assuming your basing your standards on, since the bike shot looks just fine by 1991 standards. the t-1000 liquid fx would only be good enough for temps for me by today's standards. pretty much the same goes for 2012 too.. its amazing you talk about the donut over all the absolutely horrible shots in the snowy mountains in china. as i've said i actually enjoy discussing peoples opinions when they actually watched it on film.. but there's always guys who watch it off-format and then throw their 2 cents in.. we dont do the fx for digital.. when it looks right on film it goes out. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th October 2025 - 05:55 PM |